Fun Reading // October 23, 2007
My wife came across this blog searching for something totally different and its really fun to read. It called Monday Morning Insight - basically this guy searches the web for interesting stories on Christian and quasi-Christian topics and posts them. Here is a post from 2005 about debating on a blog:
Church Leaders Telling Each Other "You're Stupid!"
Do any of you read the comic strip Dilbert? Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert also has a blog, and last week he posted a column about how people debate on blogs. I've found this to be oh, so true here at the MMI blog. Allow me to share some of Scott's post:
A few days ago I invited the readers of my blog to tell me why I’m stupid. The results are in.
If you are new to the Internet, allow me to explain how to debate in this medium. When one person makes any kind of statement, all you need to do is apply one of these methods to make it sound stupid. Then go on the offensive.
1. Turn someone’s generality into an absolute. For example, if someone makes a general statement that Americans celebrate Christmas, point out that some people are Jewish and so anyone who thinks that ALL Americans celebrate Christmas is stupid. (Bonus points for accusing the person of being anti-Semitic.)
2. Turn someone’s factual statements into implied preferences. For example, if someone mentions that not all Catholic priests are pedophiles, accuse the person who said it of siding with pedophiles.
3. Turn factual statements into implied equivalents. For example, if someone says that Ghandi didn’t eat cows, accuse the person of stupidly implying that cows deserve equal billing with Gandhi.
4. Omit key words. For example, if someone says that people can’t eat rocks, accuse the person of being stupid for suggesting that people can’t eat. Bonus points for arguing that some people CAN eat pebbles if they try hard enough.
5. Assume the dumbest interpretation. For example, if someone says that he can run a mile in 12 minutes, assume he means it happens underwater and argue that no one can hold his breath that long.
6. Hallucinate entirely different points. For example, if someone says apples grow on trees, accuse him of saying snakes have arms and then point out how stupid that is.
7. Use the intellectual laziness card. For example, if someone says that ice is cold, recommend that he take graduate courses in chemistry and meteorology before jumping to stupid conclusions that display a complete ignorance of the complexity of ice.
Humorous? Yes, but very, very true. I've seen most all of these at play here. As Christians, why do so many of us seem to take such pride in proving other Christians wrong? What's up with that?
Let's vow to not make these communication errors here at the blog from this moment on.
Fun reading with a point!
Church Leaders Telling Each Other "You're Stupid!"
Do any of you read the comic strip Dilbert? Scott Adams, the creator of Dilbert also has a blog, and last week he posted a column about how people debate on blogs. I've found this to be oh, so true here at the MMI blog. Allow me to share some of Scott's post:
A few days ago I invited the readers of my blog to tell me why I’m stupid. The results are in.
If you are new to the Internet, allow me to explain how to debate in this medium. When one person makes any kind of statement, all you need to do is apply one of these methods to make it sound stupid. Then go on the offensive.
1. Turn someone’s generality into an absolute. For example, if someone makes a general statement that Americans celebrate Christmas, point out that some people are Jewish and so anyone who thinks that ALL Americans celebrate Christmas is stupid. (Bonus points for accusing the person of being anti-Semitic.)
2. Turn someone’s factual statements into implied preferences. For example, if someone mentions that not all Catholic priests are pedophiles, accuse the person who said it of siding with pedophiles.
3. Turn factual statements into implied equivalents. For example, if someone says that Ghandi didn’t eat cows, accuse the person of stupidly implying that cows deserve equal billing with Gandhi.
4. Omit key words. For example, if someone says that people can’t eat rocks, accuse the person of being stupid for suggesting that people can’t eat. Bonus points for arguing that some people CAN eat pebbles if they try hard enough.
5. Assume the dumbest interpretation. For example, if someone says that he can run a mile in 12 minutes, assume he means it happens underwater and argue that no one can hold his breath that long.
6. Hallucinate entirely different points. For example, if someone says apples grow on trees, accuse him of saying snakes have arms and then point out how stupid that is.
7. Use the intellectual laziness card. For example, if someone says that ice is cold, recommend that he take graduate courses in chemistry and meteorology before jumping to stupid conclusions that display a complete ignorance of the complexity of ice.
Humorous? Yes, but very, very true. I've seen most all of these at play here. As Christians, why do so many of us seem to take such pride in proving other Christians wrong? What's up with that?
Let's vow to not make these communication errors here at the blog from this moment on.
Fun reading with a point!
1 Comments
Leave a comment
Chaplain Jon Fisher
Hey...ran across your site looking at you chaplain's kit. Good job on the kit--and this site!